<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustainable Furniture By William Stranger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decojournal.com/200911/sustainable-furniture-by-william-stranger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decojournal.com/200911/sustainable-furniture-by-william-stranger/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 04:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geery L</title>
		<link>http://decojournal.com/200911/sustainable-furniture-by-william-stranger/comment-page-1/#comment-48187</link>
		<dc:creator>Geery L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decojournal.com/?p=2019#comment-48187</guid>
		<description>Stranger does a great job at woodworking per se---but I personally do not see any groundbreaking compositions or creative and unique use of materials.

 In wood making I believe it is imperative that the artist or craftsman capitalize on the materials unique characteristics--the piece should celebrate the wood, grain, texture and not compete with it-I believe once complete --one should get a sense of its transcendent nature as if untouched by a craftsman. woodworking is a way for a man to express his love for the inherent beauty of the material he works with--including it&#039;s flaws. To say that these pieces of furniture are beautiful are very subjective: I ask that you ask: What part of the piece is mans work, and what part of the piece is natures? If you can see within the piece of furniture a difference then we have to say that the piece is manipulated. Where does a mans hand influence the wood and when does the wood influence a mans touch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stranger does a great job at woodworking per se&#8212;but I personally do not see any groundbreaking compositions or creative and unique use of materials.</p>
<p> In wood making I believe it is imperative that the artist or craftsman capitalize on the materials unique characteristics&#8211;the piece should celebrate the wood, grain, texture and not compete with it-I believe once complete &#8211;one should get a sense of its transcendent nature as if untouched by a craftsman. woodworking is a way for a man to express his love for the inherent beauty of the material he works with&#8211;including it&#8217;s flaws. To say that these pieces of furniture are beautiful are very subjective: I ask that you ask: What part of the piece is mans work, and what part of the piece is natures? If you can see within the piece of furniture a difference then we have to say that the piece is manipulated. Where does a mans hand influence the wood and when does the wood influence a mans touch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellcatzach</title>
		<link>http://decojournal.com/200911/sustainable-furniture-by-william-stranger/comment-page-1/#comment-48174</link>
		<dc:creator>Hellcatzach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decojournal.com/?p=2019#comment-48174</guid>
		<description>This is nice wood, but the designs under utilize how beautiful the wood can actually be.  Slapping a few boards together in an asymetrical minimalistic way may be architecturally appealing to the same vapid people that love IKEA, but is it fine art?  I guess it is in the eye of the beholder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice wood, but the designs under utilize how beautiful the wood can actually be.  Slapping a few boards together in an asymetrical minimalistic way may be architecturally appealing to the same vapid people that love IKEA, but is it fine art?  I guess it is in the eye of the beholder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

